High Pressure Jobs and Disability Rights When Performance Reviews Cross the Line

/in /by

In high-pressure working environments, performance can be closely monitored. While employers are entitled to set performance expectations, they must ensure that any performance assessment is legally fair and carried out in compliance with the Equality Act 2010, which provides important protections for disabled employees. 

In practice, disputes often arise not because performance is being managed, but because it is being managed without properly accounting for the impact disabilities can have on everyday life. This distinction is often central to determining whether a case involves unlawful discrimination.

Disability Discrimination and the Legal Framework

The Equality Act 2010 (EqA) protects disabled employees from several forms of discrimination, including direct discrimination, indirect discrimination, harassment, victimisation, and failure to make reasonable adjustments in the workplace.

Section 15 of the EqA is particularly relevant in performance-related cases. It applies where an employee is subjected to unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of their disability. This treatment will be unlawful unless the employer can show the treatment is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

In practice, this often arises where performance concerns are linked to disability-related absences, fluctuating capacity, cognitive effects, or recovery periods. The key legal question is not simply whether performance standards were met, but whether the employer properly considered the underlying reasons before taking action.

Employment Tribunals will typically examine whether the employer understood the disability and its impact, and whether adjustments were considered before formal action was taken.

When Performance Processes are Legally Risky

Performance management can become a legal concern when standard procedures are applied without properly accounting for a disability. This is particularly common in target-driven environments where output is heavily measured. Risk often arises when:

  • Performance targets are set without considering medical limitations
  • Disability-related absence is treated as poor performance or capability failure
  • Disciplinary processes begin without a meaningful discussion about adjustments
  • Occupational health advice is not properly implemented or is inconsistently applied
  • Performance is assessed purely on output without considering the underlying disability

A central issue in disability discrimination and unfair dismissal cases is whether the employer followed a fair process. Employment Tribunals will focus on whether the employee’s condition was properly understood, whether its impact was assessed, and whether alternative approaches were genuinely considered. Even when performance concerns are legitimate, a failure to properly accommodate a disability can undermine the fairness of the process.

Reasonable Adjustments in Practice

The need to make reasonable adjustments is a core part of the Equality Act 2010. It requires employers to take proactive steps to remove or reduce disadvantages faced by disabled employees where a workplace policy places them at a substantial disadvantage.

This applies throughout employment, including during performance management, and is ongoing. Employers are expected to review adjustments as circumstances change, particularly where performance concerns or symptoms fluctuate over time. In practice, reasonable adjustments might include:

  • Adjusting performance targets 
  • Allowing additional time to meet objectives
  • Modifying working hours or workload distribution
  • Providing structured support or mentoring
  • Pausing formal capability procedures where appropriate
  • Implementing phased return-to-work arrangements following absence

Whenever an employer knows, or could reasonably be expected to know, about an employee’s disability, they should discuss what adjustments can be made. Disputes often arise where employers claim insufficient knowledge. Whether an adjustment is reasonable depends on factors such as the employer’s size, the cost of the adjustment, and the impact it would have. However, Tribunals expect evidence of genuine consideration, not a superficial approach.

A failure to comply with this duty can result in a standalone claim and can also strengthen related claims such as discrimination arising from disability or unfair dismissal.

Discrimination Arising from Disability 

Section 15 claims often arise when employers rely on the consequences of disability as grounds for taking formal action, such as absences, reduced productivity, or fluctuating performance.

These cases frequently rely on justification, and the burden of proof lies with the employer to explain why the potentially discriminatory conduct occurred. Employers might argue that action was necessary for operational reasons. Still, Tribunals will expect evidence that this was properly balanced against the impact on the employee and that less discriminatory alternatives were considered. If they are unable to provide a justification unrelated to the disability, an Employment Tribunal will infer discrimination. 

When assessing these claims, tribunals typically focus on:

  • Whether the employer understood the nature and impact of the disability
  • Whether occupational health evidence was properly obtained and used
  • Whether adjustments were properly considered and tried
  • Whether expectations were realistic in light of known medical issues
  • Whether escalation occurred without meaningful intervention or review

In many cases, it is the overall pattern of performance management, rather than individual incidents, that determines whether disability discrimination has occurred. It will be incredibly difficult to justify discriminatory behaviour if a reasonable adjustment could have been made.

Learn More About Disability Discrimination in the Workplace

Getting tailored legal advice is beneficial when performance concerns escalate into formal disciplinary processes, particularly if disability-related factors have not been properly considered. An employment law specialist can help clarify whether the situation falls within Section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, whether reasonable adjustments could have been made, and whether the process followed is legally defensible. 

With the help of a legal professional, employees can also assess their options, including internal resolution, negotiation, or formal legal action. It is important to remember that high-pressure roles do not remove legal protections for disabled employees. Employers have clear obligations, and failing to make reasonable adjustments can result in discrimination claims. 

If you are concerned that performance management is not reflecting your disability fairly, or you are facing formal action at work, Damian McCarthy can provide some initial advice. Get in touch today to find out more about the EqA and the next steps for your situation.